<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EyeHackerBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Rantings of an (Un)Usually Sane Ophthalmologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Chesterton on Islam by Ethan</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/09/20/chesterton-on-islam/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/09/20/chesterton-on-islam/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>your right the case in the middle east cannot be won by force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your right the case in the middle east cannot be won by force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MIT Courses Now Online by madhu bhat</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/mit-courses-now-online/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>madhu bhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/14/mit-courses-now-online/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Its good.
visit; http://www.madhubhat.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good.<br />
visit; <a href="http://www.madhubhat.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.madhubhat.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Al Gore&#8217;s Carbon Footprint? by Liaifyinc</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/12/what-is-al-gores-carbon-footprint/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Liaifyinc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/12/what-is-al-gores-carbon-footprint/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Interesting internet site: Hope to come back again soon=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting internet site: Hope to come back again soon=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HillaryCare: A Look Into the Future by WPHost</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/hillarycare-a-look-into-the-future/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>WPHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/hillarycare-a-look-into-the-future/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;surgery center...&lt;/strong&gt;

Great article ;) Keep up the good work!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>surgery center&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Great article <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Keep up the good work!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sean Hannity vs. Catholic Priest by Ggoose</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/sean-hannity-vs-catholic-priest/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Ggoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/12/sean-hannity-vs-catholic-priest/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Excellent response! Thanks for stopping by the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent response! Thanks for stopping by the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shame on Penn by BizzyBlog &#38;#187; So Many Great SOB Alliance Posts, So Little Time</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/shame-on-penn/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#38;#187; So Many Great SOB Alliance Posts, So Little Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/shame-on-penn/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Eye Hacker covered a story I meant to get to &#8212; the controversy over the clueless president of the University of Pennsylvania posing with someone dressed as a completely outfitted suicide bomber for Halloween. That&#8217;s right on the edge of being another one of those boomeranging &#8220;October/November surprises&#8221; the left is inflicting on itself in the final weeks of the campaign. In fact, in PA it could sway a few votes in the Casey-Santorum race &#8212; and not in Casey&#8217;s direction. Michelle Malkin covered the apology on Friday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eye Hacker covered a story I meant to get to &#38;#8212; the controversy over the clueless president of the University of Pennsylvania posing with someone dressed as a completely outfitted suicide bomber for Halloween. That&#38;#8217;s right on the edge of being another one of those boomeranging &#38;#8220;October/November surprises&#38;#8221; the left is inflicting on itself in the final weeks of the campaign. In fact, in PA it could sway a few votes in the Casey-Santorum race &#38;#8212; and not in Casey&#38;#8217;s direction. Michelle Malkin covered the apology on Friday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Global Warmer Deniers Series by Sean</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/global-warmer-deniers-series/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/10/global-warmer-deniers-series/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Here is an url that you can send to friends and family that will direct them to the video &quot;The Great Global Warming Swindle&quot;.

http://gorelied.notlong.com 

For more information on the documentary you can go here.

http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an url that you can send to friends and family that will direct them to the video &#8220;The Great Global Warming Swindle&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://gorelied.notlong.com" rel="nofollow">http://gorelied.notlong.com</a> </p>
<p>For more information on the documentary you can go here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CO2 is Good For You! by BizzyBlog &#38;#187; Globaloney and Globalarmism: Consensus, Conschmensus</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/03/co2-is-good-for-you/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#38;#187; Globaloney and Globalarmism: Consensus, Conschmensus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/03/03/co2-is-good-for-you/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE, March 8: Especially in response to Comment 2 below and other disinfo, this description (HT Wizblog) of the signers and the nature of the projectis worthy of note &#8211; Signers of this petition also include 5,017 scientists whose fields of specialization in chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and other life sciences &#8230;.. make them especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide upon the Earth’s plant and animal life. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE, March 8: Especially in response to Comment 2 below and other disinfo, this description (HT Wizblog) of the signers and the nature of the projectis worthy of note &#38;#8211; Signers of this petition also include 5,017 scientists whose fields of specialization in chemistry, biochemistry, biology, and other life sciences &#38;#8230;.. make them especially well qualified to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide upon the Earth’s plant and animal life. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Al Gore&#8217;s Carbon Footprint? by EyeHackerBlog &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; An Inconvenient Electric Bill</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/12/what-is-al-gores-carbon-footprint/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>EyeHackerBlog &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; An Inconvenient Electric Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 01:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2007/02/12/what-is-al-gores-carbon-footprint/#comment-20</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Al Gore, politician now turned environmental scientist and Oscar winning eco-docu-hysterian, may have some &#38;#8217;splanin to do. It seems that Al and the Tipper, at their Tennessee mansion, use about twenty times the national average electric per year. And that&#38;#8217;s just one of their several homes. According to the Tennessee Center for Policy Research (HT:Matt Drudge):  Gore’s mansion, located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service (NES).  In his documentary, the former Vice President calls on Americans to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption at home.  The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.  Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359.  Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.  Gore’s extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore’s mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year.  “As the spokesman of choice for the global warming movement, Al Gore has to be willing to walk the walk, not just talk the talk, when it comes to home energy use,” said Tennessee Center for Policy Research President Drew Johnson.  In total, Gore paid nearly $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills for his Nashville estate in 2006.  And we have not yet included in the carbon footprint that Al and the Tipper make the other homes and private jetting all over the world.   But as I&#38;#8217;ve always said, liberals will always excuse themselves from the behavior they would like to dictate to the little people. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is Truth? by BizzyBlog &#38;#187; So Many Good SOB Alliance Posts, So Little Time</title>
		<link>http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/what-is-truth/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#38;#187; So Many Good SOB Alliance Posts, So Little Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eyehacker.wordpress.com/2006/10/26/what-is-truth/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] EyeHackerBlog covered the Hugh Hewitt interview/slugfest with Andrew Sullivan last week that I mentioned briefly in an earlier post, and honed in on Sullivan&#8217;s heretical recasting of Vatican II as an excuse to dismiss papal authority if your conscience tells you otherwise. Nice try, Andy &#8212; no sale. UPDATE: Non-SOB blog Deep Thought fisked the conscience question in great detail, and finds Sullivan&#8217;s take on Vatican II totally wrong, to the point where he questions Sullivan&#8217;s right to call himself a Catholic. Money quote: &#8220;The trickiest part of claiming to be Catholic, though, is that there is actually a definition. Mr. Sullivan doesn’t seem to match it.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EyeHackerBlog covered the Hugh Hewitt interview/slugfest with Andrew Sullivan last week that I mentioned briefly in an earlier post, and honed in on Sullivan&#38;#8217;s heretical recasting of Vatican II as an excuse to dismiss papal authority if your conscience tells you otherwise. Nice try, Andy &#38;#8212; no sale. UPDATE: Non-SOB blog Deep Thought fisked the conscience question in great detail, and finds Sullivan&#38;#8217;s take on Vatican II totally wrong, to the point where he questions Sullivan&#38;#8217;s right to call himself a Catholic. Money quote: &#38;#8220;The trickiest part of claiming to be Catholic, though, is that there is actually a definition. Mr. Sullivan doesn’t seem to match it.&#38;#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
